Reverse Proxy CGNAT

The main task of these two popular technologies is to provide security for the Internet user. Despite a certain similarity of tasks, they are performed absolutely differently. Proxy, although it allows you to remain anonymous and bypass blocked sites, it is still quite vulnerable, especially when it comes to untested services. VPN in this regard looks preferable, because thanks to end-to-end encryption it reliably protects information from the entry point to the exit point.

Both versions of the protocol, at first glance, are able to provide anonymity on the Internet, as well as bypass all kinds of blockages. In addition, they are not only suitable for online entertainment, but also for work (study). This is what unites them to some extent, but there are still more differences. These are primarily the number of IP addresses, the cost of rent, appearance, connection speed, ping, and security. The IPv4 protocol, developed in the 1980s, is a more outdated model with a number of significant problems, including inefficient routing.

Both on a PC and on modern cell phones, a built-in utility that is responsible for working with network connections, provides the ability to set up a connection through a proxy server. You just need to enter the IP-address for connection and the port number. In the future all traffic will be redirected through this proxy. Accordingly, the provider will not block it.

There are special online services that use IP and HTTP connection tags to determine if a proxy is being used from your equipment. The most popular are Proxy Checker, Socproxy.

UDP Hole Punching is a technique used to establish a connection between two devices behind NAT (Network Address Translation) firewalls. It works by exploiting the fact that some UDP packets can still pass through the NAT firewall even if the source and destination ports are the same. However, UDP Hole Punching does not always bypass NAT for several reasons:

1. Symmetric NAT: In symmetric NAT, both the source and destination ports are translated, and the NAT firewall maintains a table of active connections. If the table is not updated correctly, UDP hole punching may not work.

2. Unstable NAT: Some NAT firewalls are known to be unstable, causing them to drop packets or change their behavior unexpectedly. This can lead to failure in establishing a connection using UDP hole punching.

3. Firewall rules: Some NAT firewalls have strict rules that prevent UDP hole punching from working. For example, if the firewall is configured to block all incoming UDP traffic, UDP hole punching will not be successful.

4. Timeout: NAT firewalls have a timeout for their connection tables. If the timeout occurs before the connection is established, UDP hole punching will fail.

5. Network congestion: If the network is congested, packets may be dropped or delayed, causing UDP hole punching to fail.

In summary, while UDP hole punching can be an effective technique for bypassing NAT, it does not always guarantee a successful connection due to various factors such as NAT behavior, firewall rules, and network conditions.